|
Post by robin on Oct 30, 2012 10:44:48 GMT -8
I have been interested in studying why Dan is missing from the 144000 mention in the book of Revelation and I'm interested in any ideas or theory's others have on the subject.
|
|
|
Post by stevekimes on Nov 1, 2012 22:51:36 GMT -8
I believe that the 144,000 are those believers in Jesus who are left after the great persecution/martyrdom mentioned in Rev. 6. Since no one (except for a very few Jews) know what tribe they are in, I believe the tribes to be symbolic, that this group is what is left of the true Israel, the living people of God.
Dan has always been a problematic tribe, and always ready to be idolatrous. It could be that Dan is just removed because the one sin Revelation cannot accept is idolatry.
It is interesting to me that the tribe of "Joseph" is mentioned as well as Joseph's son Manasseh. Although Joseph could be just a stand in for Ephraim, it is interesting that Manasseh would really be half the tribe of Joseph.
Again, the tribes are messed with enough that I can't consider them literal genetic tribes.
|
|
|
Post by robin on Nov 2, 2012 4:27:58 GMT -8
What is you overall view of Revelation, Steve? Are you a futurist, preterist, historicist, or spiritualist? It would help me understand where your coming from.
|
|
|
Post by stevekimes on Nov 3, 2012 16:45:08 GMT -8
I am mostly a futurist, but I see more of Revelation as historical than most (like chapters 4-6).
|
|
|
Post by robin on Nov 3, 2012 19:36:35 GMT -8
So you think this prophecy has been fulfilled? In what sence, or what event can a person look at as a potential fulfillment of this prophecy?
|
|
|
Post by Josh on Nov 4, 2012 9:03:35 GMT -8
Wouldn't that mean that he thinks it has a future fulfillment, as the prophecy is in chapter 7?
|
|
|
Post by Josh on Nov 4, 2012 9:04:31 GMT -8
I don't have time, but I think it would be helpful for someone to post the list of the 12 tribes from the OT next to the list from Revelation as a reference point.
|
|
|
Post by stevekimes on Nov 4, 2012 9:37:48 GMT -8
Ugg. I tried and failed. Can't get them to line up right.
In Exodus 1:2-5 there is a list of the 12 sons. In Deuteronomy 27:12-13 there is a short list of the 12 tribes. In Numbers 1 and following there is a longer list of the 12 tribes and tribal leaders.
Joseph had two sons, Manessah and Ephraim. Ephraim was the largest (half) tribe for a long time, so much so that the northern kingdom of Israel was at times called Ephraim, occasionally it is called Joseph. In Numbers 1 and following, both Ephraim and Manessah are mentioned separately, under the title "the sons of Joseph".
Dan is mentioned in every list of the tribes except for Rev 7.
|
|
|
Post by Josh on Nov 4, 2012 19:13:10 GMT -8
I'm not very good at tables either Jacob's Sons: Reuben, Simeon, Levi, Judah, Issachar, Zebulun, Benjamin, Dan, Naphtali, Gad, Asher, and Joseph |
Tribes that Received Territory: Reuben, Simeon, Judah, Issachar, Zebulun, Benjamin, Dan, Naphtali, Gad, Asher, Ephraim, and Manasseh |
Tribes in Revelation: Reuben, Simeon, Levi, Judah, Issachar, Zebulun, Benjamin, Naphtali, Gad, Asher, Manasseh, Joseph |
|
|
|
Post by Josh on Nov 4, 2012 19:32:17 GMT -8
So, here's my theory:
There were 12 sons originally, but when it came time for the allotment of land, the Levites were to be spread throughout the land and not receive an allotment of their own territory. But perhaps since the Israelites were so fond of 12 and because Joseph's tribe had gotten to be bigger than the others, it was split into Ephraim and Manasseh, one of which replaced "Joseph" and the other which replaced "Levi".
However, when it comes to Revelation and the eschatological kingdom of God, the Levites are re-included because of their importance as priests who represent the priesthood of believers. This created a weird 13 tribe situation, so one was cut out, and perhaps Dan was chosen due to their infamous idolatry. This may symbolize how in God's kingdom, God has uprooted the elements that have rebelled against him and supplanted them with new shoots as he chooses (as in Romans 11).
That's my best guess.
|
|
|
Post by robin on Nov 5, 2012 9:38:26 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by Josh on Nov 5, 2012 14:20:37 GMT -8
The futurist take on those two passages is weak. It reads too much into them. Neither statement sheds a particularly negative light on Dan.
|
|
|
Post by Josh on Nov 5, 2012 14:22:59 GMT -8
I think this sealing was of the Jewish believers who escaped the destruction of Jerusalem due to Jesus warning. They were the faithful remnant of the 12 tribes.
|
|
|
Post by robin on Nov 5, 2012 16:54:07 GMT -8
Lets just say a better case can be made, but I don't see the weakness that you do in those passages.
Overall I just wanted to see if anyone else thought that the omission of Dan held much significance, and it appears that besides idle worship, which all of the tribes were involved in, you don't think it goes beyond that. Am I correct?
|
|
|
Post by Josh on Nov 5, 2012 19:09:55 GMT -8
|
|